Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RESOLVEIPV6 config flag #138

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017
Merged

Add RESOLVEIPV6 config flag #138

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017

Conversation

DL6ER
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER commented Oct 1, 2017

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes, eg [X]) Failure to fill the template will close your PR:

Please submit all pull requests against the development branch. Failure to do so will delay or deny your request

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

How familiar are you with the codebase?:

10


Add config flag RESOLVEIPV6=yes|no to specify whether FTL should try to resolve IPv6 addresses to host names or not. Several users (like @WaLLy3K ) have seen issues with IPv6 addresses being resolved to extremely cumbersome generic ISP host names.

This template was created based on the work of udemy-dl.

Copy link
Contributor

@AzureMarker AzureMarker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change the flag name to RESOLVE_IPV6 so it is more readable, like QUERY_DISPLAY.

@AzureMarker
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting for v2.11.1 to be released

@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit 1adaa78 into development Oct 10, 2017
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the tweak/IPv6resolverflag branch October 10, 2017 17:05
@DL6ER DL6ER mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2017
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants