Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make FTL builds faster #852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020
Merged

Make FTL builds faster #852

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020

Conversation

DL6ER
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER commented Jul 21, 2020

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

How familiar are you with the codebase?:

10


Factor out FTL sources into a separate object. This slightly enhances compilation speed.

… compilation speed.

Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
@DL6ER DL6ER added this to the v5.1.1 milestone Jul 21, 2020
@DL6ER DL6ER requested review from PromoFaux and dschaper July 21, 2020 18:49
@dschaper
Copy link
Member

Jeeze, and I thought makefiles were convoluted.

@dschaper
Copy link
Member

Sorry, thought I got all the 5.1.1's.

@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit 58ebe22 into release/v5.1.1 Jul 24, 2020
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the tweak/make_build_faster branch July 24, 2020 05:39
@DL6ER DL6ER mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2020
5 tasks
@pralor-bot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/pi-hole-ftl-v5-2-released/36964/1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants