Do not block shared memory when inactive upstreams are skipped #893

DL6ER · 2020-09-23T13:51:59Z

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

I have read and understood the contributors guide.
I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

How familiar are you with the codebase?:

10

This fixes a variant of the bug in development which was forgotten in #889

… was missed in #889 Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>

…ivate functions static. Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>

pralor-bot · 2020-09-23T13:55:30Z

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

pralor-bot · 2020-11-28T19:28:40Z

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

DL6ER added 2 commits September 23, 2020 15:46

Do not block shared memory when inactive upstreams are skipped. This…

80ac229

… was missed in #889 Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>

Rename resolveForwardDestinations() to resolveUpstreams() and make pr…

1a41b44

…ivate functions static. Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>

DL6ER added Bugfix Bug in development labels Sep 23, 2020

DL6ER requested review from PromoFaux and dschaper September 23, 2020 13:52

dschaper approved these changes Sep 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

DL6ER merged commit 9f213af into development Sep 23, 2020

DL6ER deleted the fix/development_locked_old_upstreams branch September 23, 2020 19:05