Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ib rt pps update hotfix.. #350

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2022
Merged

ib rt pps update hotfix.. #350

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2022

Conversation

goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

@goodboy goodboy commented Jul 5, 2022

Not sure this didn't get caught in usage, but basically real-time
updates got broken by a rework of update_ledger_from_api_trades().
The issue is that the ledger was being updated before calling
piker.pp.update_pps_conf() which resulted in the Position.size
not being updated correctly since the [latest added] clears passed
in via the trade_records arg were already found in the .clears table
and thus were causing the loop to skip the Position.lifo_update()
call..

The solution here is to not update the ledger until after we call
update_pps_conf() - it's more read/writes but it's correct and we
figure out a less io heavy way to do the file writing later.

Further this includes a fix to avoid double emitting a pp update caused
by non-thorough logic that waits for a commission report to arrive
during a fill event; previously we were emitting the same message twice
due to the lack of a check for an existing comms report in the case
where the report arrives after the fill.

Not sure this didn't get caught in usage, but basically real-time
updates got broken by a rework of `update_ledger_from_api_trades()`.
The issue is that the ledger was being updated **before** calling
`piker.pp.update_pps_conf()` which resulted in the `Position.size`
not being updated correctly since the [latest added] clears passed
in via the `trade_records` arg were already found in the `.clears` table
and thus were causing the loop to skip the `Position.lifo_update()`
call..

The solution here is to not update the ledger **until after** we call
`update_pps_conf()` - it's more read/writes but it's correct and we
figure out a less io heavy way to do the file writing later.

Further this includes a fix to avoid double emitting a pp update caused
by non-thorough logic that waits for a commission report to arrive
during a fill event; previously we were emitting the same message twice
due to the lack of a check for an existing comms report in the case
where the report arrives *after* the fill.
@goodboy goodboy added bug guille broke it prolly broker-backend `brokerd`/`datad` related backend tech ledger trade, accounts and other user focal event history tracking, management and storage labels Jul 5, 2022
@goodboy goodboy requested a review from guilledk July 5, 2022 20:29
@goodboy goodboy mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2022
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
@goodboy goodboy merged commit a229996 into master Jul 6, 2022
@goodboy goodboy deleted the ib_rt_pp_update_hotfix branch July 6, 2022 00:55
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
goodboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2022
Addressing same issue as in #350 where we need to compute position
updates using the *first read* from the ledger **before** we update it
to make sure `Position.lifo_update()` gets called and **not skipped**
because new trades were read as clears entries but haven't actually been
included in update calcs yet.. aka we call `Position.lifo_update()`.

Main change here is to convert `update_ledger()` into a context mngr so
that the ledger write is committed after pps updates using
`pp.update_pps_conf()`..

This is basically a hotfix to #346 as well.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
broker-backend `brokerd`/`datad` related backend tech bug guille broke it prolly ledger trade, accounts and other user focal event history tracking, management and storage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant