Expand urllib3 compatibility to 1.26.0 #267
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jhamon
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
In #263 we tested urllib3 compatibility back to 1.26.16. I can't recall where that specific number came from, but I want to try going all the way back to 1.26.0 (a 2020 release) and see if that causes any issues.
The urllib3 migration guide suggests keeping support at 1.26.x so I'm hopeful things will just work since they seem pretty sensitive to the needs of maintainers.
Solution
Adjust test matrix and
pyproject.toml.Type of Change