Fix minor errors in performance tuning config #21527
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hfxsd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've made several minor corrections and improvements to the tidb-performance-tuning-config.md documentation. My aim was to enhance the readability, consistency, and accuracy of the configuration guide. This includes fixing formatting issues, standardizing capitalization in tables, and providing clearer links to related documentation, all to ensure that users have the most precise and helpful information when tuning TiDB performance.
Highlights
- Documentation Formatting: I've updated the formatting for the 'Trade-offs' section related to RocksDB Titan configuration, converting a simple numbered list into an unordered HTML list to ensure it renders correctly and is more readable within the documentation.
- Typographical Correction: I've made minor capitalization adjustments in the performance comparison table, specifically changing 'load data' to 'Load data' and 'workloada' to 'Workload' for better consistency and presentation.
- Documentation Clarity and Linking: I've enhanced the clarity of the 'Auto-commit' instruction by adding a direct markdown link to the
autocommitsystem variable documentation, allowing users to easily navigate to the relevant details.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
hfxsd
added
needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several minor fixes to the performance tuning documentation. The changes improve formatting and clarity in a few places. My review includes suggestions to further enhance formatting consistency and to correct a change that inadvertently altered a specific workload name.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@Yui-Song: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
hfxsd
added
lgtm
translation/done
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?