model: add functionality to check if a base table #1080
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
mentioned this pull request
Co-authored-by: kennytm <kennytm@gmail.com>
ti-srebot
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2020
|
cherry pick to release-4.0 failed |
tiancaiamao
pushed a commit
to tiancaiamao/parser
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
This will be used in pingcap/tidb#20880
I added a new function instead of checking for not a sequence or a view, because I think there are other cases that need this that may currently only test for not a view, but should also test for not a sequence.
What is changed and how it works?
New function to safely test for is a table.
Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes