Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stats: fix shallow copy bugs #12691

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2019
Merged

stats: fix shallow copy bugs #12691

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2019

Conversation

alivxxx
Copy link
Contributor

@alivxxx alivxxx commented Oct 14, 2019

What problem does this PR solve?

We cannot just store bytes that get from chunk row, it can be rewrited by others.

What is changed and how it works?

Deep copy bytes values that need to be stored directly in stats.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Code changes

  • Has exported function/method change

Side effects

  • None

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Release note

  • Fix shalolow copy bugs in statistics.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12691 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #12691   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   80.4244%   80.4244%           
===========================================
  Files           465        465           
  Lines        108600     108600           
===========================================
  Hits          87341      87341           
  Misses        14898      14898           
  Partials       6361       6361

@alivxxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

alivxxx commented Oct 17, 2019

/rebuild

Copy link
Member

@winoros winoros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There're some other places using chunk.Row.GetDatum. Need we change these places too?

@alivxxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

alivxxx commented Oct 17, 2019

@winoros They are fine because they are not stored directly.

@alivxxx alivxxx requested a review from winoros October 17, 2019 07:57
Copy link
Member

@winoros winoros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@lzmhhh123 lzmhhh123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lzmhhh123 lzmhhh123 added the status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. label Oct 18, 2019
@alivxxx alivxxx added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 18, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 18, 2019

/run-all-tests

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@sre-bot sre-bot merged commit 2175bdd into pingcap:master Oct 18, 2019
@alivxxx alivxxx deleted the shallow-copy branch October 18, 2019 07:36
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 18, 2019

cherry pick to release-3.0 in PR #12817

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 18, 2019

cherry pick to release-3.1 in PR #12818

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/statistics status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants