Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: fix the bug that wrong collation is used when try fast path for enum or set (#23217) #23292

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 18, 2021

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Mar 12, 2021

cherry-pick #23217 to release-4.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/23292

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/23292:release-4.0-689a5983e1c0

Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 huangwenjun1997@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #23053

Problem Summary:
When comparing datum, we used the wrong collation.

		dVal, err := d.ConvertTo(stmtCtx, &col.FieldType)
		if err != nil {
			if terror.ErrorEqual(types.ErrOverflow, err) {
				return append(nvPairs, nameValuePair{colName: colName.Name.Name.L, value: d, param: param}), true
			}
			// Some scenarios cast to int with error, but we may use this value in point get.
			if !terror.ErrorEqual(types.ErrTruncatedWrongVal, err) {
				return nil, false
			}
		}
		cmp, err := d.CompareDatum(stmtCtx, &dval)

CompareDatum uses the d's collation, which is wrong.

What is changed and how it works?

d.CompareDatum(stmtCtx, &dval) =>
dVal.CompareDatum(stmtCtx, &d)

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Side effects

Release note

  • fix the bug that wrong collation is used when try fast path for enum or set

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot added component/expression size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/4.0-cherry-pick type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. labels Mar 12, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 12, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added this to the v4.0.11 milestone Mar 12, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 12, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wjhuang2016 you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 12, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Reminiscent Reminiscent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 15, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Reminiscent
  • qw4990

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 18, 2021
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Mar 18, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 70317bb

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 18, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Mar 18, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit aad2f72 into pingcap:release-4.0 Mar 18, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl modified the milestones: v4.0.11, v4.0.12 Mar 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. component/expression size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/4.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants