Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

types: fix collation for binary literal #23591

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2021

Conversation

wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 huangwenjun1997@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #23581

Problem Summary:
Collation is not set for the binary literal.
When call compareBinaryLiteral(), it may get the wrong result.

What is changed and how it works?

Set collation for the binary literal.

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Side effects

Release note

  • fix collation for binary literal

Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 <huangwenjun1997@gmail.com>
@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2021 09:52
@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 requested review from qw4990 and removed request for a team March 26, 2021 09:52
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 26, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 26, 2021
@lysu
Copy link
Contributor

lysu commented Mar 26, 2021

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • lysu
  • winoros

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 26, 2021
@lysu
Copy link
Contributor

lysu commented Mar 26, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: ce30e79

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 26, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit c9e041e into pingcap:master Mar 26, 2021
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2021
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #23598

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2021
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0 in PR #23599

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 deleted the fix_collation_hex branch November 17, 2022 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression needs-cherry-pick-release-5.0 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The result of simple select wrong when cluster index is on
5 participants