Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: remove Skip() for some unstable test cases #28379

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

bb7133
Copy link
Member

@bb7133 bb7133 commented Sep 26, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

Some unstable test cases are skipped by my previous commits like:

The original intention is that those unstable tests can be assigned and fixed eventually. However, most of them are not fixed as planned.

What is changed and how it works?

Bring the skipped unstable test cases back.

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 26, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 26, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ngaut ngaut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 27, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 28, 2021
@wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: e5359ed45b96847ed3b9de7eea04341a239123eb

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 28, 2021
@@ -8589,9 +8589,6 @@ func (s testSerialSuite) TestExprBlackListForEnum(c *C) {
}

func (s *testResourceTagSuite) TestResourceGroupTag(c *C) {
if israce.RaceEnabled {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this line cause CI always failed due to unused import.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[2021-10-02T00:40:06.788Z] executor/executor_test.go:72:2: "github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/israce" imported but not used (typecheck)
[2021-10-02T00:40:06.788Z] 	"github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/israce"
[2021-10-02T00:40:06.788Z] 	^
[2021-10-02T00:40:06.788Z] executor/parallel_apply_test.go:26:2: "github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/israce" imported but not used (typecheck)
[2021-10-02T00:40:06.788Z] 	"github.com/pingcap/tidb/util/israce"

@@ -571,10 +571,6 @@ func (s *testSuite) TestApplyCacheRatio(c *C) {
}

func (s *testSuite) TestApplyGoroutinePanic(c *C) {
if israce.RaceEnabled {
Copy link
Contributor

@tisonkun tisonkun Oct 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@bb7133: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 3, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

Merge canceled because a new commit is pushed.

@tisonkun
Copy link
Contributor

tisonkun commented Oct 7, 2021

Thanks for your update @bb7133 ! I think you can merge by yourself :)

@tisonkun
Copy link
Contributor

tisonkun commented Oct 7, 2021

/run-check_dev_2

@tisonkun tisonkun self-requested a review October 7, 2021 02:07
@@ -1914,7 +1913,7 @@ func (ts *tidbTestTopSQLSuite) TestTopSQLAgent(c *C) {
dbt.mustExec("set @@global.tidb_top_sql_max_statement_count=5;")
setTopSQLReceiverAddress(agentServer.Address())
agentServer.WaitCollectCnt(1, time.Second*4)
checkFn(5)
checkFn(6)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bb7133 it seems this test failed.

[2021-10-07T02:03:08.934Z] tidb_test.go:1916:
[2021-10-07T02:03:08.934Z]     checkFn(6)
[2021-10-07T02:03:08.934Z] tidb_test.go:1880:
[2021-10-07T02:03:08.934Z]     c.Assert(exist, IsTrue)
[2021-10-07T02:03:08.934Z] ... obtained bool = false

Copy link
Contributor

@tisonkun tisonkun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we bring back unstable tests without fixing it, even this PR is hardly merge. Can we call for fixing these tests?

Otherwise we should force merge this PR and tolerate unstable CI in the following days.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. label Oct 7, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 2, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@bb7133: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

We can try to remove Skip() again. But it is still a hard task.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2023

@bb7133: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-br-integration-test f2c75bc link true /test pull-br-integration-test
pull-integration-ddl-test f2c75bc link true /test pull-integration-ddl-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted a comment from ti-chi-bot Dec 19, 2023
@bb7133 bb7133 closed this Dec 29, 2023
@bb7133 bb7133 deleted the bb7133/remove_skip branch December 29, 2023 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants