Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

statistics: batch insert topn and bucket when saving table stats (#35326) #35545

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Jun 20, 2022

cherry-pick #35326 to release-5.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/35545

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/35545:release-5.0-6266817ced5e

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #35142

Problem Summary:

Analyze partition table is slower than analyze non-partition table with the same amount of data.

What is changed and how it works?

In SaveTableStatsToStorage, we execute one insert statement for each topn and each bucket so there are too many insertions in the transaction and make the function time-consuming. The PR batches insertions for topn and bucket and make SaveTableStatsToStorage more efficient.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    For a table with 40 million rows and 20 partitions, analyze takes 9min and SaveTableStatsToStorage for one partition takes 21s. After the PR, analyze takes 3min and SaveTableStatsToStorage for one partition takes 4s.
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Jun 20, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jun 20, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.0-cherry-pick labels Jun 20, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 20, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added this to the v5.0.6 milestone Jun 20, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xuyifangreeneyes you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@VelocityLight
Copy link

This pull request is closed because it's related version has closed automatic cherry-picking.
If it's still needed, you can reopen it or just regenerate it using bot,
see:

You can find more details at:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants