Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix left join on partition table generate invalid lock key (#35732) #35773

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Jun 28, 2022

cherry-pick #35732 to release-6.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/35773

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/35773:release-6.0-82f0faf78a6d

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #28073

Problem Summary:

select * from t1 left join t2 ... for update
t2 is partition table.

In the left join case, the physical column id might be 0,
because when a row in t1 but not in t2, NULL will be filled...
and the physical column ID is not set in the row.

It cause the for update generate the invalid lock key with physical ID = 0

What is changed and how it works?

Skip the physical ID = 0 lock key to avoid that case.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

By the way, I find something seems wrong:

  • kv storage Scan() API seems don't scan the lock CF... (I'm not sure is it by design? there is also a ScanLock() API used by the GCWorker)

  • We should use 'begin pessimistic' in the test so the lock key is written before the transaction commit. In optimistic txn mode, the lock key is buffered and written until commit... then the test code can't read that lock

  • Integration test

  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jun 28, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/6.0-cherry-pick labels Jun 28, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot requested review from bb7133, mjonss and qw4990 June 28, 2022 05:10
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tiancaiamao you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Aug 30, 2022

closed for DMR version

@xhebox xhebox closed this Aug 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/6.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants