-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: Supports create/alter/drop resource group #40188
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3b5676a
*: Supports create/alter/drop resource group
nolouch 62d0397
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into resource-group/curd
nolouch 8fa8e45
add native mode
nolouch 0644d92
address comments
nolouch 092a770
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into resource-group/curd
nolouch aee2eed
update kvproto
nolouch f0ad0db
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into resource-group/curd
nolouch 70fdee6
remove accident file
nolouch 5bacb05
add full load resource group
nolouch 112c804
allow br backup
nolouch a6caeae
fix test
nolouch 62594ae
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into resource-group/curd
nolouch a253054
clean
nolouch ac16047
Merge branch 'master' into resource-group/curd
ti-chi-bot 4e65198
Merge branch 'master' into resource-group/curd
ti-chi-bot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better to let br support resource group DDL. Is there any problem to do so?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see placement policy not supported, I just following it. Both of them are look like configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are not the same. Because placement policy is relate to the cluster topology, so restore the placement rule to a different cluster may be not very useful. But resource group is not, I think it's useful to just restore the resource group settings. BTW, if we want to not ignore the resource group DDL, we should also skip the user bind resource group name attribute to let it in a consistent state, it seems hard to do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I skip this check first, and will do more after this PR. record in #40371.