Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lightning: support data files with bom header (#40813) #40834

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #40813

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #40744

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

When reading the CSV / SQL data file's first block, trim the BOM header, and update the processed position.
Originally I planned to use a wrapped Reader to handle that. However, this will cause the processed position in parser not updated, thus resulting in abnormalities.
For example, when the file has a BOM header, after processing the first line data with 10 bytes, the parser position should be set to 10 + 3 = 13 , not 10. If set to 10, after processing all the file data, the final position is not equal to the chunk end offset, which is calculated by the file size. Then this termination if clause won't be hit:

if kvSize >= minDeliverBytes || len(kvPacket) >= maxKvPairsCnt || newOffset == cr.chunk.Chunk.EndOffset {
canDeliver = true
kvSize = 0
}
. That will cause the parser re-scan some file data again.
So the data manipulation is handled when reading data blocks. In this way we can also update the processed positions in the block parser.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Jan 29, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • dsdashun
  • gozssky

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Jan 29, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR. labels Jan 29, 2023
@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/run-build

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Jan 31, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jan 31, 2023
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Mar 3, 2023
@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/run-build

@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 12, 2023
@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: de917c3

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 12, 2023
@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

3 similar comments
@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@dsdashun
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit f1115e1 into pingcap:release-6.5 Apr 12, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@ti-chi-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev de917c3 link true /test check-dev
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mysql-test de917c3 link unknown /test mysql-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Apr 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants