lightning: use PD HTTP client

[lance6716]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #48740

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

lightning local backend switch from pdController to tikv/pd#7300

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  pass existing tests

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @lance6716. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #49599 (5431750) into master (d84df2b) will increase coverage by 0.5229%.
Report is 14 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 0.0000%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #49599        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   71.0024%   71.5253%   +0.5229%     
================================================
  Files          1368       1423        +55     
  Lines        399178     420880     +21702     
================================================
+ Hits         283426     301036     +17610     
- Misses        95967     100984      +5017     
+ Partials      19785      18860       -925     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	43.6648% <0.0000%> (?)
unit	71.0083% <ø> (+0.0059%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9663% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	47.2680% <0.0000%> (-5.6142%)	⬇️

[lance6716]

/test pull-lightning-integration-test

[lance6716]

/test pull-lightning-integration-test

[hawkingrei]

/test all

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2023-12-21 02:50:33.490449694 +0000 UTC m=+1102124.527676621: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.
• 2023-12-21 02:58:07.24423821 +0000 UTC m=+1102578.281465136: ☑️ agreed by D3Hunter.

[Benjamin2037]

LGTM

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Benjamin2037, D3Hunter, hawkingrei, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/OWNERS [YuJuncen]
• br/pkg/lightning/OWNERS [Benjamin2037,D3Hunter]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #49646.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #52126.