-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
external: make global sort common.Range
unencoded
#51900
Conversation
Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #51900 +/- ##
=================================================
- Coverage 70.7641% 54.8082% -15.9559%
=================================================
Files 1477 1588 +111
Lines 438517 611829 +173312
=================================================
+ Hits 310313 335333 +25020
- Misses 108797 253294 +144497
- Partials 19407 23202 +3795
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
common.Range
unencoded
/ok-to-test |
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Benjamin2037, lance6716, YuJuncen The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #51910
Problem Summary:
Previously, start key / end key of
common.Range
is NOT encoded for local engine, but encoded for external engine. This will cause external engine generates a wrong range, and no data will be ingest to TiKV:tidb/br/pkg/lightning/backend/local/local.go
Lines 1010 to 1014 in bdc64e5
tidb/br/pkg/lightning/backend/external/engine.go
Lines 513 to 527 in bdc64e5
If
keyRange.Start
is encoded,m.firstAndLastKeyIndex
will encode it again. Thus, these keys are encoded twice.What changed and how does it work?
After this PR, we will follow the conventions as below:
For both local and external engines,
common.Range
are not encoded.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.