ddl: do not reference owner_id for specific system DDL (#53332)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #53332

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53327

Problem Summary:

In #53234, TiDB fails to execute below upgrade DDL, because it needs to access owner_id from tidb_mdl_info.

ALTER TABLE mysql.tidb_mdl_info ADD COLUMN owner_id VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT '';

What changed and how does it work?

For the DDLs related to system tables, we skip using owner_id field to prevent above DDL failed.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  1. Prepare a v8.0.0 cluster.
  2. Kill v8.0.0 TiDB server.
  3. Start latest(compiled from this PR) TiDB server.
  4. Execute upgrade process normally. It can also serve users' DDL.
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Since this bug is not released to any versions, release-note is not necessary.

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-05-16 09:33:59.83316833 +0000 UTC m=+1732193.590303903: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.
• 2024-05-16 09:34:18.263410466 +0000 UTC m=+1732212.020546038: ☑️ agreed by D3Hunter.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter, tangenta, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [tangenta,wjhuang2016]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 48.00000% with 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-8.1@e40b817). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-8.1     #53334   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   71.1938%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1465           
  Lines                  ?     421420           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     300025           
  Misses                 ?     100941           
  Partials               ?      20454           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	71.1938% <48.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9957% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	40.9738% <0.0000%> (?)