-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
table: simplify the locate partition args for PartitionedTable
#53432
Conversation
Hi @lcwangchao. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
if t.meta.Partition.Expr != "" { | ||
e, err := expression.ParseSimpleExpr(ctx, t.meta.Partition.Expr, expression.WithTableInfo("", t.meta)) | ||
if err == nil { | ||
val, _, err := e.EvalInt(ctx.GetEvalCtx(), chunk.MutRowFromDatums(r).ToRow()) | ||
if err == nil { | ||
valueMsg = strconv.FormatInt(val, 10) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems this branch is only for range partitioning table, so I removed it. PTAL @mjonss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, if it is RANGE COLUMNS, then t.meta.Partition.Expr
should be empty, since it should only allow a list of columns.
e, err := expression.ParseSimpleExpr(ctx, t.meta.Partition.Expr, expression.WithTableInfo("", t.meta)) | ||
if err == nil { | ||
val, _, err := e.EvalInt(ctx.GetEvalCtx(), chunk.MutRowFromDatums(r).ToRow()) | ||
if err == nil { | ||
if unsigned { | ||
valueMsg = fmt.Sprintf("%d", uint64(val)) | ||
} else { | ||
valueMsg = fmt.Sprintf("%d", val) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The expression value seems already computed in the previous step and we can just use ret in the message. PTAL @mjonss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems right.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53432 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.5410% 74.5121% +1.9711%
================================================
Files 1505 1505
Lines 429838 431139 +1301
================================================
+ Hits 311809 321251 +9442
+ Misses 98743 89959 -8784
- Partials 19286 19929 +643
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/retest |
@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/retest |
@lcwangchao: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mjonss, qw4990, tangenta The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #53431
Problem Summary:
Seems we can replace
expression.BuildContext
withexpression.EvalContext
forPartitionedTable
because we only need to "evaluate" an expression.What changed and how does it work?
expression.BuildContext
withexpression.EvalContext
in some methods inPartitionedTable
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.