ddl: support create sequences with BatchCreateTableWithInfo

[tangenta]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53374

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

• Invoke callHookOnChanged after BatchCreateTableWithInfo.
• Refactor and extract createSequenceWithCheck.
• Support create sequences in onCreateTables.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tangenta]

/ok-to-test
/check-issue-triage-complete

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 54.54545% with 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.9398%. Comparing base (d1b8c5b) to head (fe4c767).
Report is 30 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #53465        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.5278%   75.9398%   +3.4119%     
================================================
  Files          1505       1506         +1     
  Lines        429865     435750      +5885     
================================================
+ Hits         311772     330908     +19136     
+ Misses        98812      84627     -14185     
- Partials      19281      20215       +934     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	51.2194% <48.4848%> (?)
unit	72.0504% <54.5454%> (+0.6338%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9957% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	61.2612% <ø> (+19.8640%)	⬆️

[AilinKid]

LGTM

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-05-22 07:31:24.446939511 +0000 UTC m=+2243238.204075083: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.
• 2024-05-23 02:03:02.191722597 +0000 UTC m=+2309935.948858167: ☑️ agreed by Leavrth.

[wjhuang2016]

Why add model.StatePublic here?

[tangenta]

The reason is the same as #51870. Maybe we can set this state on caller side, let's refactor these in next PR.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, Leavrth, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/OWNERS [Leavrth]
• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [wjhuang2016]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tangenta]

Encounter an unstable test that will be fixed by #53566

[tangenta]

/retest

[tangenta]

/retest