-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ddl: remove mock.Context
usage in addIndexIngestWorker
#53479
ddl: remove mock.Context
usage in addIndexIngestWorker
#53479
Conversation
Hi @lcwangchao. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
sessCtx, err := newSessCtx(reorgInfo.d.store, reorgInfo.ReorgMeta.SQLMode, reorgInfo.ReorgMeta.Location, reorgInfo.ReorgMeta.ResourceGroupName) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
b.sendResult(&backfillResult{err: err}) | ||
return nil | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
newAddIndexIngestWorker
is only called by createWorker
, so we moved the context construction to newAddIndexIngestWorker
.
One difference is that if it fails to construct the context, the previous code will always call b.sendResult
but the current code will check writerMaxID:
if b.writerMaxID == 0 {
b.sendResult(&backfillResult{err: err})
return nil
}
Maybe the previous code lost it? PTAL @tangenta
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, LGTM
3b92ef4
to
0ae6ac4
Compare
616d4fe
to
ea942ff
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53479 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.8824% 74.6694% +3.7869%
================================================
Files 1506 1506
Lines 412222 431723 +19501
================================================
+ Hits 292193 322365 +30172
+ Misses 100640 89512 -11128
- Partials 19389 19846 +457
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tangenta, YangKeao The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ea942ff
to
ac4ec62
Compare
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #53388
Problem Summary:
see description in issue.
What changed and how does it work?
mock.Context
inaddIndexIngestWorker
initSessCtx
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.