Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: Add TIME_TRUNCATE_FRACTIONAL sql_mode #56442

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mjonss
Copy link
Contributor

@mjonss mjonss commented Oct 3, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #29406

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Adds support for TIME_TRUNCATE_FRACTIONAL sql_mode, truncating DATETIME/TIMESTAMP/TIME instead of rouding it.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Hi @mjonss. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.24528% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.0375%. Comparing base (5e8bb8e) to head (7988a88).
Report is 205 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #56442        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.3611%   76.0375%   +2.6763%     
================================================
  Files          1626       1648        +22     
  Lines        449213     457224      +8011     
================================================
+ Hits         329548     347662     +18114     
+ Misses        99482      87905     -11577     
- Partials      20183      21657      +1474     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 51.8390% <71.6981%> (?)
unit 72.4429% <79.2452%> (-0.0219%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9478% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 63.0995% <ø> (+17.5356%) ⬆️

@dveeden dveeden self-requested a review October 4, 2024 12:11
Copy link
Contributor

@dveeden dveeden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The example from the MySQL docs:

sql> CREATE TABLE t (id INT, tval TIME(1));
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.0096 sec)

sql> SET sql_mode='';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.0003 sec)

sql> INSERT INTO t (id, tval) VALUES(1, 1.55);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.0010 sec)

sql> SET sql_mode='TIME_TRUNCATE_FRACTIONAL';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.0001 sec)

sql> INSERT INTO t (id, tval) VALUES(2, 1.55);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.0008 sec)

sql> SELECT id, tval FROM t ORDER BY id;
+----+------------+
| id | tval       |
+----+------------+
|  1 | 00:00:01.6 |
|  2 | 00:00:01.5 |
+----+------------+
2 rows in set (0.0014 sec)

sql> SELECT TIDB_VERSION()\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
TIDB_VERSION(): Release Version: v8.4.0-alpha-338-g640dc8844c
Edition: Community
Git Commit Hash: 640dc8844cbd0d3ff1fafa64ce213afcc7dd25a4
Git Branch: time_truncate_fractional-sqlmode
UTC Build Time: 2024-10-04 15:02:03
GoVersion: devel go1.24-065c1359 Fri Oct 4 14:49:31 2024 +0000
Race Enabled: false
Check Table Before Drop: false
Store: unistore
1 row in set (0.0007 sec)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Oct 4, 2024
@dveeden
Copy link
Contributor

dveeden commented Oct 4, 2024

I think "Changes MySQL compatibility" should be checked and I also think this needs a release note.

pkg/parser/mysql/const.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dveeden
Copy link
Contributor

dveeden commented Oct 4, 2024

TiDB:

sql> SELECT UTC_TIMESTAMP(7);
ERROR: 1105 (HY000): Too-big precision 7 specified for 'curtime'. Maximum is 6

MySQL:

sql> SELECT UTC_TIMESTAMP(7);
ERROR: 1426 (42000): Too-big precision 7 specified for 'utc_timestamp'. Maximum is 6.
  1. The error code is different
  2. The sqlstate is different
  3. The name of the function in the error message is different.

Maybe we should create a new issue for this?

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Oct 4, 2024
Co-authored-by: Daniël van Eeden <github@myname.nl>
@mjonss
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjonss commented Oct 4, 2024

TiDB:

sql> SELECT UTC_TIMESTAMP(7);
ERROR: 1105 (HY000): Too-big precision 7 specified for 'curtime'. Maximum is 6

MySQL:

sql> SELECT UTC_TIMESTAMP(7);
ERROR: 1426 (42000): Too-big precision 7 specified for 'utc_timestamp'. Maximum is 6.
  1. The error code is different
  2. The sqlstate is different
  3. The name of the function in the error message is different.

Maybe we should create a new issue for this?

I created #56451.

@mjonss
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjonss commented Oct 7, 2024

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Oct 7, 2024

@mjonss: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dveeden
Copy link
Contributor

dveeden commented Oct 7, 2024

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Oct 7, 2024
pkg/types/time.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/types/time.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-10-04 15:15:40.264090338 +0000 UTC m=+627095.684303347: ☑️ agreed by dveeden.
  • 2024-10-10 03:50:58.016555098 +0000 UTC m=+1104413.436768142: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.

@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @tangenta @zanmato1984

Copy link
Contributor

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nits.

pkg/expression/integration_test/integration_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/expression/integration_test/integration_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mjonss
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjonss commented Oct 10, 2024

@zanmato1984 @lance6716 Are there any reason that this SQL mode needs to be included in TiKV/TiFlash/UniStore? Can there be any coprocessor calls that would be affected? Or how can I look for it?

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2024

@mjonss: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mysql-test 7988a88 link true /test mysql-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor

zanmato1984 commented Oct 11, 2024

@zanmato1984 @lance6716 Are there any reason that this SQL mode needs to be included in TiKV/TiFlash/UniStore? Can there be any coprocessor calls that would be affected? Or how can I look for it?

Seems this SQL mode affects function from_unixtime() (please correct me if I'm missing anything), which is currently pushed down to TiFlash

ast.DateDiff, ast.TimestampDiff, ast.DateFormat, ast.FromUnixTime,
(but not TiKV
ast.PeriodAdd, ast.PeriodDiff, /*ast.TimestampDiff, ast.DateAdd, ast.FromUnixTime,*/
). So I think we'll need it supported in TiFlash.

It'll be great if you can directly work on that. Here are some links in TiFlash that may help:

If you have any difficulties, please let me know, and our team will love to help or take over.

Thanks.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 12, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dveeden, lance6716, zanmato1984
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from tangenta, ensuring that each of them provides their approval before proceeding. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 8, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 8, 2024

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support sql_mode TIME_TRUNCATE_FRACTIONAL
5 participants