Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix data race in hash join v2 spill #57519

Merged

Conversation

windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #57450

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Init rowTableBulider in BuildWorkerV2 before start worker.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 19, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Hi @windtalker. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.6139%. Comparing base (35d5739) to head (79f4df9).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57519        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8582%   73.6139%   +0.7557%     
================================================
  Files          1672       1676         +4     
  Lines        462955     467187      +4232     
================================================
+ Hits         337301     343915      +6614     
+ Misses       104875     102480      -2395     
- Partials      20779      20792        +13     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 43.1984% <100.0000%> (?)
unit 72.3791% <100.0000%> (+0.1332%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 46.6973% <ø> (+1.6096%) ⬆️
---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@xzhangxian1008 xzhangxian1008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wshwsh12, xzhangxian1008

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm approved and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-11-20 01:34:27.845280974 +0000 UTC m=+1011230.036149971: ☑️ agreed by xzhangxian1008.
  • 2024-11-20 03:37:35.564780576 +0000 UTC m=+2843.184435093: ☑️ agreed by wshwsh12.

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2024

@windtalker: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev_2 79f4df9 link unknown /test check-dev2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test check-dev2

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 20, 2024

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test check-dev2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 5116115 into pingcap:master Nov 20, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57536.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants