Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support gcs scheme in redo log #7987

Closed
CharlesCheung96 opened this issue Dec 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7993
Closed

support gcs scheme in redo log #7987

CharlesCheung96 opened this issue Dec 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7993
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@CharlesCheung96
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem?

[consistent] 
level = "eventual"
storage = "gcs://dp-uw1/fubintest/redolog?credentials-file=gcp-qa-dp-testing-dev-36aee7310524.json"
max-log-size = 1 

Use the above configuration to create changefeed and meets such error: [CDC:ErrConsistentStorage]consistent storage (gcs) not support.

Describe the feature you'd like

support gcs scheme in redo log

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Teachability, Documentation, Adoption, Migration Strategy

No response

@CharlesCheung96 CharlesCheung96 added the type/feature Issues about a new feature label Dec 28, 2022
@CharlesCheung96 CharlesCheung96 self-assigned this Dec 28, 2022
@CharlesCheung96 CharlesCheung96 added type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug. and removed type/feature Issues about a new feature labels Dec 29, 2022
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
CharlesCheung96 added a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflow that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
CharlesCheung96 added a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflow that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
CharlesCheung96 added a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflow that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
CharlesCheung96 added a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflow that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants