-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sorter(ticdc): use correct cgroup memory limit in some scenarios (#8589) #8624
sorter(ticdc): use correct cgroup memory limit in some scenarios (#8589) #8624
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has not been approved. To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: bf9c4f9
|
/run-dm-integration-test |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #8589
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #8588
What is changed and how it works?
Use a better way to fetch cgroup memory limit.
Check List
Tests
Have been verified in the following scenarios
docker run
container undercontainerd-shim-runc-v2
with memory limitdocker run
container undercontainerd-shim-runc-v2
without memory limitQuestions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note