deps: update to newly maintained version of jmespath

[BitForger]

closes #223

@jsumners here is an updated version of jmespath. I will maintain it until the jmespath project revives, if that happens.

[mcollina]

lgtm

[jsumners]

I will maintain it until the jmespath project revives, if that happens.

Has there been any attempt to communicate with the original project?

[BitForger]

I will maintain it until the jmespath project revives, if that happens.

Has there been any attempt to communicate with the original project?

Yeah there was an issue in jmespath/jmespath.site#65 where the author claimed to be coming back in 2020 but has since to be heard from again.

[mcollina]

lgtm

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1206011091

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1200500617:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	319
Relevant Lines:	319

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1206011091

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1200500617:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	319
Relevant Lines:	319

---

💛 - Coveralls

[jsumners]

I want to think about this some more. I don't like the state of upstream, but I also don't know of any other actual equivalent. Right now I'm thinking either:

1. Drop the feature completely.
2. I start the fork in the Pino org and invite you to help maintain it.

[mcollina]

Maybe dropping the feature is ok.

[jsumners]

Let's do it. Less maintenance is better maintenance.