Skip to content

Conversation

@mengelbart
Copy link
Contributor

Rename rfc8888 packages. We don't have any other packages named after the respective RFCs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 7.14286% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.56%. Comparing base (3cb438f) to head (7f82d87).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/rfc8888/rfc8888.go 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #351      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.64%   78.56%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          82       83       +1     
  Lines        5113     5126      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         4021     4027       +6     
- Misses        921      930       +9     
+ Partials      171      169       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
go 78.56% <7.14%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
wasm 75.92% <7.14%> (-0.20%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mengelbart mengelbart force-pushed the fix/rfc8888-package-name branch 2 times, most recently from 9d7c0ca to fa6661b Compare July 31, 2025 11:49
@mengelbart mengelbart requested a review from JoeTurki July 31, 2025 11:49
@mengelbart mengelbart force-pushed the fix/rfc8888-package-name branch from fa6661b to 7f82d87 Compare September 10, 2025 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants