Link to ReturnType from $Call docs #155
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
piotrwitek
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2020
macchiitaka
referenced
this pull request
in macchiitaka/tasks-app-nextjs
Jan 22, 2024
[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [utility-types](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types) | [`3.10.0` -> `3.11.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/utility-types/3.10.0/3.11.0) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>piotrwitek/utility-types (utility-types)</summary> ### [`v3.11.0`](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/releases/tag/v3.11.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/compare/v3.10.0...v3.11.0) #### What's Changed - Fix a typo in README by [@​gamtiq](https://togithub.com/gamtiq) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/153](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/153) - add "Nullish" type alias by [@​zhirzh](https://togithub.com/zhirzh) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/152](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/152) - Fix typo in $Call documentation by [@​kumar303](https://togithub.com/kumar303) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/154](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/154) - Link to ReturnType from $Call docs by [@​kumar303](https://togithub.com/kumar303) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/155](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/155) - fix: ReadOnly<T> has a typo in its documentation ([#​156](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/issues/156)) by [@​cyli2014](https://togithub.com/cyli2014) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/157](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/157) - fix: DeepPartial with generic parameter should allow assigning {} by [@​mpiniarski](https://togithub.com/mpiniarski) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/184](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/184) - Fix typo in $Call comment by [@​Yuddomack](https://togithub.com/Yuddomack) in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/185](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/185) #### New Contributors - [@​gamtiq](https://togithub.com/gamtiq) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/153](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/153) - [@​zhirzh](https://togithub.com/zhirzh) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/152](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/152) - [@​kumar303](https://togithub.com/kumar303) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/154](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/154) - [@​cyli2014](https://togithub.com/cyli2014) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/157](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/157) - [@​mpiniarski](https://togithub.com/mpiniarski) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/184](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/184) - [@​Yuddomack](https://togithub.com/Yuddomack) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/185](https://togithub.com/piotrwitek/utility-types/pull/185) **Full Changelog**: piotrwitek/utility-types@v3.10.0...v3.11.0 </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "after 10pm every weekday,before 5am every weekday,every weekend" in timezone Asia/Tokyo, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/macchiitaka/tasks-app-nextjs). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4xMzUuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjEzNS4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiJ9--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
](https://renovatebot.com){kind=link}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This adds a link to
ReturnTypefrom the$Calldocs so that the user can decide if that will be easier for them. I personally had run into issues with union types whereReturnTypeworked better.I wasn't sure if it would be better to link to the
ReturnTypeimplementation inutility-typesor not, just let me know.Related issues:
See #149
Checklist
For bugfixes:
For new features:
dts-jest