You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many (but not all) non-human genes expect three digits in their first field.
It would be nice if "DLA-88*001:01" were treated as equivalent to "DLA-88*01:01", but seems to require curating a database of which genes expect how many digits in each of their first two fields.
The number seems to vary from 2 (common in older allele formats) to 4 (very rare but does happen).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Getting this right will be pretty involved, since some genes default to 2 digits in the first field and others 3 (even in the same species). It depends on the degree of population diversity for the gene.
Many (but not all) non-human genes expect three digits in their first field.
It would be nice if "DLA-88*001:01" were treated as equivalent to "DLA-88*01:01", but seems to require curating a database of which genes expect how many digits in each of their first two fields.
The number seems to vary from 2 (common in older allele formats) to 4 (very rare but does happen).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: