New file information predicates in planck.io #863
Assignees
Labels
native-sdk
Public SDK requiring native support
Comments
|
Note: I am working on some of this as we speak, but am unable to assign the issue to myself - @mfikes please feel free to assign it to me. |
mfikes
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 24, 2019
…es to planck.io (#864) * 🆕 Adds exists?, regular-file? and symbolic-link? predicates to planck.io namespace (issue #863) * 📚 Adds docs for new fns in planck.io ns * 📚 Add PR #864 changes to CHANGELOG * 🚑 Remove type hints, as requested in review of PR #864 * ☔ Add tests for fns added in PR #864 * 🚑 Comment out tests that are unreliable across platforms * 🚑 Make changelog entry format consistent * ☔ Fix tests for regular files and directories * 🆕 Adds hidden-file? fn to planck.io * 🆕 Make path-elements and file-name public, based on PR feedback * 🚑 Re-apply updated docstring to markdown docs * 🚑 Remove warning regarding exists? in planck.io * 🚑 Restore spurious whitespace * 🚑 Restore spurious whitespace * 🚑 Bring published doc inline with docstring * 🚑 Improves implementation consistency * 🚑 Update predicates based on review feedback
|
I believe this is fixed in rev 0071f60. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Following on from the discussion in #858 this is requesting the addition of the following predicates to the
planck.ionamespace:exists?- does the given file or directory exist on disk (similar tojava.nio.file.Files.exists())regular-file?- is the given file or directory "regular" (similar tojava.nio.file.Files.isRegularFile())hidden-file?- is the given file or directory "hidden" (similar tojava.nio.file.Files.isHidden())symbolic-link?- is the given file a symbolic link (similar tojava.nio.file.Files.isSymbolicLink())The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: