add 'tickformatstops' #1965

apalchys · 2017-08-22T06:36:51Z

Related to #1946

This PR adds tickformatstops axis config attribute. The purpose of new attribute is to help customize formatting of axis ticks by dtick value aka "zoom level". The following types of axis support tickformatstops:

date
linear

Usage example:

tickformatstops:
[
    {
        dtickrange: [null, 1000],
        value: "%H:%M:%S.%L"
    },
    {
        dtickrange: [1000, 60000],
        value: "%H:%M:%S"
    }
]

dtickrange should be specified using 2-value array with dtick values.
Also it is possible to use null as value if start/end of range is not defined. In this case it will be interpred as absolute mix/max value.
The value should be valid tickformat string

I will add tests later if the implementation looks good.

Question to discuss:

If ranges overlaps, the code takes max applicable range. For example we have the following dtickranges

Reorganization [part 1] #1 [86400000, "M1"]
Reorganization [part 2] #2 ["M1", "M12"]
README and CONTRIBUTING updates #3 ["M12", null]

M1 is specified in ranges #1 and #2 and the code will apply a format string associated with range #2.
Is it ok?

Do we need to support log axis?

etpinard · 2017-08-22T13:50:23Z

Looking solid so far! Thanks very much @apalchys 🎉

If ranges overlaps, the code takes max applicable range

At first glance, that sounds right to me. 👍

Do we need to support log axis

Yes please!

I will add tests later if the implementation looks good.

😏

etpinard · 2017-08-22T13:54:17Z

tasks/util/strict_d3.js


        if(pathIn === 'd3' && opts.file !== pathToStrictD3Module) {
-            pathOut = 'require(\'' + pathToStrictD3Module + '\')';
+            pathOut = 'require(\'' + pathToStrictD3Module.replace(/\\/g, '/') + '\')';


Why do we need this?

We need it for windows users. I've updated the code and added comment.

etpinard · 2017-08-22T14:03:51Z

src/plots/cartesian/layout_attributes.js

        ].join(' ')
    },
+    tickformatstops: {
+        valType: 'any',


We can do better here.

See for example the layout.slider declaration here. The steps array container is declared using the ✨ special ✨ _isLinkedToArray.

So, this here should look like:

tickformatstops: { _isLinkedToArray: 'tickformatstop', dtickrange: { valType: 'info_array', // ... declared just like 'range' above }, values: { valType: 'any', // ... } }

etpinard · 2017-08-22T14:05:09Z

src/plots/cartesian/tick_label_defaults.js


        if(axType !== 'category') {
            var tickFormat = coerce('tickformat');
+            coerce('tickformatstops');


Why not category?

... also, you'll need to a little more work coercing tickformatstop after having addressed https://github.com/plotly/plotly.js/pull/1965/files#r134489590 - see the layout.slider defaults for an example.

Why not category?

Since dtick is always 1 for category axis type (at least all my tests show it), I still have no idea how tickformatstops should work for it 🤔 Maybe you have any thoughts?

Right, dtickrange wouldn't make sense for category axes. I'm thinking for category axes each tickformatstop item would have:

{ ticktext: [/* */], tickvals: [/* */] }

just like regular axis-level tickvals and ticktext offering a solution for #1812

The range of each tickformatstop is determined by the tickvals[0] and tickvals[1].

My apologies, I thought I had written that down somewhere before 😏

No problem, but not sure that I got everything right :)
Let's confirm expected behaviour. For example:

I have the following categories:
['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/brQwjG

then I define tickformatstops:

tickformatstops: [{ ticktext: ['a-c'], tickvals: ['a', 'c'] }, { ticktext: ['d-e'], tickvals: ['d', 'e'] }]

and as result I get only 2 ticks:
['a-c', 'd-e']

Is it correct?

@talgalili

Hi @apalchys
This seems reasonable.
Question: does this need to be defined manually, or could it be automatically extracted from the values? For example, if we have 300 categories, that there would be a value setting to show only 30 categories at most. And if we are at a zoom level with many of the categories, it would spread them across the axis.
(I apologies if what I say makes little sense in this context. I more often deal with higher level implementations)

@talgalili I see what you say but not sure how to fit it into the proposed API. I am quite new in Plotly community.
@etpinard maybe you have any idea?
Also is my assumption above correct? If yes, I can start the implementation.

@apalchys checking about this further with @cpsievert - it appears that what I'm looking for is

the ability to have something like nticks to be respected when tickmode='array'

(see the discussion here: talgalili/heatmaply#78 (comment) )

Is there a way the current work would be extended to deal with this?

I'll try to think some more about this issue at some point this week. Sorry for the wait.

@etpinard have you had a chance to look into it?

talgalili · 2017-08-22T22:33:20Z

Thanks @apalchys - I'm very excited about this feature being added.

apalchys · 2017-08-23T13:26:15Z

Added support for log axis

etpinard · 2017-08-23T14:40:01Z

src/plots/cartesian/layout_attributes.js

+        _isLinkedToArray: 'tickformatstop',
+
+        dtickrange: {
+            valType: 'data_array',


info_array please.

... just like range

fixed, thanks.

etpinard · 2017-08-23T14:41:40Z

src/plots/cartesian/tick_label_defaults.js

+        coerce('dtickrange');
+        coerce('value');
+
+        valuesOut.push(valueOut);


Nicely done. Thanks!

🎉

etpinard · 2017-08-23T14:44:14Z

src/traces/carpet/axis_attributes.js

            '*%H~%M~%S.%2f* would display *09~15~23.46*'
        ].join(' ')
    },
+    tickformatstops: {


Would you mind DRYing this up by adding

var axesAttrs = require('../../plots/cartesian/layout_attributes') // .... tickformatstops: axesAtttrs.tickformatstops, // ...

Fixed, thanks.

apalchys · 2017-08-28T19:13:18Z

added tests

etpinard · 2017-08-28T19:18:18Z

added tests

Great. Are you planning on addressing #1965 (comment) ?

apalchys · 2017-08-28T19:24:56Z

Great. Are you planning on addressing #1965 (comment) ?

Yep. I will try to fix everything by tomorrow.

apalchys · 2017-09-05T14:40:32Z

moving discussion to the root level from #1965 (comment)

the ability to have something like nticks to be respected when tickmode='array'

It seems I am stuck here and not sure what to do next :)
After re-reading issues, it seems we needs something like this:

[{
    deltarange:  [40, 30]
    nticks: 50
},
{
    deltarange:  [800, 1200]
    nticks: 5
}]

where deltarange is a range of delta between min and max current range values (https://github.com/plotly/plotly.js/blob/master/src/plots/cartesian/axes.js#L268). In this case we can configure to display fewer ticks if we zoom out.

Also for me adding a special logic for category axis to tickformatstops (where we use dticks) looks a little bit tricky. Maybe it makes sense to move it to a separate property?

talgalili · 2017-09-05T15:19:21Z

@apalchys who (in this repo) do you think could help you solve this?
(i.e.: to gain "the ability to have something like nticks to be respected when tickmode='array' ")

apalchys · 2017-09-05T17:44:49Z

@talgalili not sure I know the answer to your question. it is my first PR and @etpinard is my first reviewer.

alexcjohnson · 2017-10-09T19:42:48Z

@apalchys apologies for letting this languish. I'm looking at the open pieces now. In merging master it looks like the issue you encountered with strict_d3 was also solved independently by #1994 - looked to me as though they both would work fine, I elected to keep #1994 but with your added comment. Does it still work correctly for you?

alexcjohnson · 2017-10-10T02:25:31Z

If ranges overlaps, the code takes max applicable range

I would actually prefer to take the first matching entry. Seems to me this is easier for users to parse, easier and more flexible to generate (you can start from the lowest and specify [null, max] for each of the dtickrange settings if you want, or start from the top and specify [min, null]) and more efficient in our code (we can bail out of the loop at the first match).

alexcjohnson · 2017-10-10T03:02:17Z

TBH I'm not sure what the goal is with adding category axes here.

category axes DO use dtick (see eg category_dtick_3 that has enough categories we don't show them all, we automatically drop to every third one)
category axes DO NOT use tickformat - what would it do? Categories are already explicit strings. so tickformatstops also seems to me not to apply.
tickvals and ticktext can be used with any axis type, but it would frankly be kind of weird to use them with category, why wouldn't you just use the label you want as the category? They're normally for putting specific ticks on other axis types.

@talgalili mentioned:

the ability to have something like nticks to be respected when tickmode='array'

That to me seems like a separate issue from what we're dealing with here. This PR is about how to format the ticks, not about which ticks to show. There's another long-neglected PR #303 that may be what you're interested in for this purpose: setting a minimum pixel distance between ticks. I think that's probably the only way you can solve this for the tickmode='array' case: nothing is guaranteed about their spacing otherwise so solutions like "display every nth tick" wouldn't work, but "iterate through the array and display each tick iff it's more than n pixels away from all the others we've already drawn" would work. @talgalili do you want to take this part of the discussion over there and see if we can revive that PR? Plotly staff may not be able to get to it any time soon though, but maybe someone else wants to pitch in...

alexcjohnson · 2017-10-10T14:25:36Z

src/plots/cartesian/axes.js

-                        return getRangeWidth(stop.dtickrange, convertToMs) > getRangeWidth(acc.dtickrange, convertToMs) ? stop : acc;
-                    }
-                }, null);
+                tickstop = ax.tickformatstops.find(function(stop) {


Nice and clean - unfortunately it doesn't look like IE supports Array.find, not even in IE11
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/find
We've also tended to gravitate toward for loops over Array methods for performance reasons. Not a big deal here as this array will be fairly small, but it should still help.

sorry, just switched from the project where is supported and don't care about IE11 support.
Replaced with for loop and fixed tests.

apalchys · 2017-10-10T15:03:18Z

I elected to keep #1994 but with your added comment. Does it still work correctly for you?

Yes, it does. Thanks.

I would actually prefer to take the first matching entry

Updated

alexcjohnson · 2017-10-10T15:29:10Z

@apalchys great, thanks for the changes! I linted and updated the baseline image for the new "first" logic. I think this is ready to go (assuming tests pass this time - ignore appveyor) but we're going to wait a few days to merge to master, so we can give v1.31 any bugfixes it needs before adding features (which will go in v1.32.0)

etpinard · 2017-10-12T14:11:01Z

src/plots/cartesian/layout_attributes.js

+        },
+        value: {
+            valType: 'string',
+            dflt: '',


Is axis.tickformat: '' a valid format? More precisely, could

tickformatstop: [{ dtickrange: [/* */], value: '' }]

be used to hide tick labels for some dtick range?

no, tickformat: '' gives our default formatting. I suppose we could imagine making our own "hide" tickformat (for date axes you can already hack this with tickformat: ' ' but that doesn't work for numbers) but it seems a bit of a kludgy way to handle a very esoteric edge case.

etpinard · 2017-10-12T14:12:42Z

test/jasmine/tests/tickformatstops_test.js

+
+var mock = require('@mocks/tickformatstops.json');
+
+function getZoomInButton(gd) {


Can we merge this file into axes_test.js? I don't see the need to break src file / test file symmetry here.

done in 0e6747f

etpinard · 2017-10-16T18:36:16Z

1.31.1 is out, 💃

add 'tickformatstops'

1baa14a

etpinard added status: in progress feature something new labels Aug 22, 2017

etpinard reviewed Aug 22, 2017

View reviewed changes

change tickformatstops definition and code review fixes

f958c3b

etpinard reviewed Aug 23, 2017

View reviewed changes

yauhen-kavaliou and others added 4 commits August 24, 2017 15:54

change valType

a155bd9

remove axis attribute duplication

be11c03

fix: add missed semicolon

a13c29e

add tests for tickformatstops

304d96b

apalchys force-pushed the tickformatstops branch from ecda2d4 to 304d96b Compare August 28, 2017 16:40

add tickformatstop image for test

0c9fb2b

Merge branch 'master' into tickformatstops

db526d9

alexcjohnson added 3 commits October 9, 2017 16:06

editTypes for tickformatstops

7f1fd41

make sure the tickformatstops tests actually run as expected

86777f7

flatten tickformatstops tests

531aea8

robustify tickformatstops supplydefaults

0b48a33

alexcjohnson mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2017

Have nticks be respected when tickmode='array' #1812

Closed

take the first matching tickformatstop

6420044

alexcjohnson reviewed Oct 10, 2017

View reviewed changes

replace Array.prototype.find with for loop and update tests

92f7c13

alexcjohnson added 2 commits October 10, 2017 11:13

lint

df72531

updated tickformatstops baseline

7665b4c

alexcjohnson added this to the v1.32.0 milestone Oct 10, 2017

alexcjohnson added status: reviewable and removed status: in progress labels Oct 10, 2017

etpinard reviewed Oct 12, 2017

View reviewed changes

merge tickformatstops_test into axes_test

0e6747f

etpinard mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2017

Add hoverlabel.zformat attribute jdugge/plotly.js#1

Closed

alexcjohnson merged commit cad8e06 into plotly:master Oct 16, 2017

etpinard mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2017

Add possibility to define custom tickformat per zoom levels #1946

Closed

etpinard mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2017

how to enable auto-formatting for time axis on zoom events with custom date-time format? #1513

Closed

etpinard mentioned this pull request May 1, 2019

Add "tickpadding" property to control distance between ticks when tickmode is auto #303

Closed


		var mock = require('@mocks/tickformatstops.json');

		function getZoomInButton(gd) {

Uh oh!

add 'tickformatstops' #1965

add 'tickformatstops' #1965

Uh oh!

Conversation

apalchys commented Aug 22, 2017

Uh oh!

etpinard commented Aug 22, 2017

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

talgalili commented Aug 22, 2017

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Aug 23, 2017

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Aug 28, 2017

Uh oh!

etpinard commented Aug 28, 2017

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Aug 28, 2017 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Sep 5, 2017

Uh oh!

talgalili commented Sep 5, 2017

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Sep 5, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcjohnson commented Oct 9, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcjohnson commented Oct 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcjohnson commented Oct 10, 2017

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Oct 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcjohnson commented Oct 10, 2017

Uh oh!

apalchys commented Aug 28, 2017 •

edited

Loading