Skip to content

Conversation

igchor
Copy link

@igchor igchor commented Jun 15, 2022

The main purpose of this patch is to better simulate workloads in
cachebench. Setting touchValue to true allows to see performance
impact of using different mediums for memory cache.


This change is Reviewable

igchor added 2 commits June 15, 2022 05:15
The main purpose of this patch is to better simulate workloads in
cachebench. Setting touchValue to true allows to see performance
impact of using different mediums for memory cache.
Copy link
Collaborator

@byrnedj byrnedj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Were these changes based on feedback from Meta? Should this be enabled by default?

@igchor
Copy link
Author

igchor commented Jun 15, 2022

Yes, this is rebased version of patch which is being reviewed by Meta. I would like to merge it once they merge the patch to upstream. After that, we should use "touchValue": true by default

@igchor
Copy link
Author

igchor commented Jun 15, 2022

Right now, we have old version of the patch on our develop branch (validateValue)

@igchor
Copy link
Author

igchor commented Jun 20, 2022

Already merged into upstream

@igchor igchor merged commit 1d16e1a into pmem:develop Jun 20, 2022
danielobiri pushed a commit to danielobiri/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#85

Reviewed By: sathyaphoenix

Differential Revision: D32806006

Pulled By: leozzx

fbshipit-source-id: b973a5bd5a3e1b7a566efb6887de21c0f8f756c4
byrnedj pushed a commit to byrnedj/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
byrnedj pushed a commit to byrnedj/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
byrnedj pushed a commit to byrnedj/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
byrnedj pushed a commit to byrnedj/CacheLib that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
byrnedj pushed a commit to byrnedj/CacheLib that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants