Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PMI: allow user to override PMI key value length #7009

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yfguo
Copy link
Contributor

@yfguo yfguo commented May 22, 2024

Pull Request Description

This PR fixes the #6924. The SDSC Expanse seems to have a long key value length that is not compatible with the MPICH default.

This PR does not depends on #7008. Only rebased on it because the formatting error is failing pre-commit hook.

Author Checklist

  • Provide Description
    Particularly focus on why, not what. Reference background, issues, test failures, xfail entries, etc.
  • Commits Follow Good Practice
    Commits are self-contained and do not do two things at once.
    Commit message is of the form: module: short description
    Commit message explains what's in the commit.
  • Passes All Tests
    Whitespace checker. Warnings test. Additional tests via comments.
  • Contribution Agreement
    For non-Argonne authors, check contribution agreement.
    If necessary, request an explicit comment from your companies PR approval manager.

@yfguo yfguo requested a review from hzhou May 22, 2024 15:08
@yfguo
Copy link
Contributor Author

yfguo commented May 22, 2024

test:mpich/ch4/ofi

/* allowing user to override default KEY VAL size for certain system setups */
MPL_env2int("PMI_MAX_KEY_SIZE", &pmi_max_key_size);
MPL_env2int("PMI_MAX_VAL_SIZE", &pmi_max_val_size);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is question whether this is the true cause of the issue. Let's hold the PR until we understand better.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, describe the actual changes in the commit message. The issue number is not github specific and not safe for downstreams.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yfguo Please refer to #6924 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants