This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add ability to exclude fields from content type hub when extracting provisioning template #2565
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ntent type hub when extracting fields for web
|
Thanks for this change @NicolajHedeager We typically try to avoid additional settings in ProvisioningTemplateCreationInformation, also would then require an additional parameter in PS. @erwinvanhunen : what do you think? |
|
I think this could be done by using the existing IncludeContentTypesFromSyndication setting. If content types from syndication is not included then fields probably also should not be included. |
|
Also if not exporting fields from syndication it would not make sense to export content types from syndication as those content types would depend on the fields from syndication. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's in this Pull Request?
This PR adds the ability to exclude fields that came from content type hub. For backwards compatibility, fields are included by default.