net/smc: Keep smc_close_final rc during active close

commit 00e158f upstream.

When smc_close_final() returns error, the return code overwrites by
kernel_sock_shutdown() in smc_close_active(). The return code of
smc_close_final() is more important than kernel_sock_shutdown(), and it
will pass to userspace directly.

Fix it by keeping both return codes, if smc_close_final() raises an
error, return it or kernel_sock_shutdown()'s.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/1f67548e-cbf6-0dce-82b5-10288a4583bd@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 606a63c ("net/smc: Ensure the active closing peer first closes clcsock")
Suggested-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

net/smc/smc_close.c

@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int smc_close_active(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	int old_state;
 	long timeout;
 	int rc = 0;
+	int rc1 = 0;
 
 	timeout = current->flags & PF_EXITING ?
 		  0 : sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) ?
@@ -232,8 +233,11 @@ int smc_close_active(struct smc_sock *smc)
 			/* actively shutdown clcsock before peer close it,
 			 * prevent peer from entering TIME_WAIT state.
 			 */
-			if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk)
-				rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR);
+			if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk) {
+				rc1 = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock,
+							   SHUT_RDWR);
+				rc = rc ? rc : rc1;
+			}
 		} else {
 			/* peer event has changed the state */
 			goto again;