bpf: Add missed var_off setting in coerce_subreg_to_size_sx()

In coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(), for the case where upper
sign extension bits are the same for smax32 and smin32
values, we missed to setup properly. This is especially
problematic if both smax32 and smin32's sign extension
bits are 1.

The following is a simple example illustrating the inconsistent
verifier states due to missed var_off:

  0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7    ; R0_w=scalar()
  1: (bf) r3 = r0                       ; R0_w=scalar(id=1) R3_w=scalar(id=1)
  2: (57) r3 &= 15                      ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=15,var_off=(0x0; 0xf))
  3: (47) r3 |= 128                     ; R3_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=128,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=143,var_off=(0x80; 0xf))
  4: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
  REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f]
    u32=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s32=[0x80, 0xffffff8f] var_off=(0x80, 0xf)

The var_off=(0x80, 0xf) is not correct, and the correct one should
be var_off=(0xffffff80; 0xf) since from insn 3, we know that at
insn 4, the sign extension bits will be 1. This patch fixed this
issue by setting var_off properly.

Fixes: 8100928 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174632.3995278-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

@@ -6281,6 +6281,7 @@ static void coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
  reg->s32_max_value = s32_max;
  reg->u32_min_value = (u32)s32_min;
  reg->u32_max_value = (u32)s32_max;
+ reg->var_off = tnum_subreg(tnum_range(s32_min, s32_max));
  return;
  }