forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
nilfs2: fix lockdep warnings in page operations for btree nodes
Patch series "nilfs2 lockdep warning fixes". The first two are to resolve the lockdep warning issue, and the last one is the accompanying cleanup and low priority. Based on your comment, this series solves the issue by separating inode object as needed. Since I was worried about the impact of the object composition changes, I tested the series carefully not to cause regressions especially for delicate functions such like disk space reclamation and snapshots. This patch (of 3): If CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled, nilfs2 hits lockdep warnings at inode_to_wb() during page/folio operations for btree nodes: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6575 at include/linux/backing-dev.h:269 inode_to_wb include/linux/backing-dev.h:269 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6575 at include/linux/backing-dev.h:269 folio_account_dirtied mm/page-writeback.c:2460 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6575 at include/linux/backing-dev.h:269 __folio_mark_dirty+0xa7c/0xe30 mm/page-writeback.c:2509 Modules linked in: ... RIP: 0010:inode_to_wb include/linux/backing-dev.h:269 [inline] RIP: 0010:folio_account_dirtied mm/page-writeback.c:2460 [inline] RIP: 0010:__folio_mark_dirty+0xa7c/0xe30 mm/page-writeback.c:2509 ... Call Trace: __set_page_dirty include/linux/pagemap.h:834 [inline] mark_buffer_dirty+0x4e6/0x650 fs/buffer.c:1145 nilfs_btree_propagate_p fs/nilfs2/btree.c:1889 [inline] nilfs_btree_propagate+0x4ae/0xea0 fs/nilfs2/btree.c:2085 nilfs_bmap_propagate+0x73/0x170 fs/nilfs2/bmap.c:337 nilfs_collect_dat_data+0x45/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:625 nilfs_segctor_apply_buffers+0x14a/0x470 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1009 nilfs_segctor_scan_file+0x47a/0x700 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1048 nilfs_segctor_collect_blocks fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1224 [inline] nilfs_segctor_collect fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1494 [inline] nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x14f3/0x6c60 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2036 nilfs_segctor_construct+0x7a7/0xb30 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2372 nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2480 [inline] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x3c3/0xf90 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2563 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 This is because nilfs2 uses two page caches for each inode and inode->i_mapping never points to one of them, the btree node cache. This causes inode_to_wb(inode) to refer to a different page cache than the caller page/folio operations such like __folio_start_writeback(), __folio_end_writeback(), or __folio_mark_dirty() acquired the lock. This patch resolves the issue by allocating and using an additional inode to hold the page cache of btree nodes. The inode is attached one-to-one to the traditional nilfs2 inode if it requires a block mapping with b-tree. This setup change is in memory only and does not affect the disk format. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1647867427-30498-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1647867427-30498-2-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YXrYvIo8YRnAOJCj@casper.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9a20b33d-b38f-b4a2-4742-c1eb5b8e4d6c@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+0d5b462a6f07447991b3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+34ef28bb2aeb28724aa0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Loading branch information
Showing
10 changed files
with
154 additions
and
50 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.