Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an API to recover kvdb from a backend DB file. #82

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adityadani
Copy link
Member

  • Added an API ReinitializeDB()
  • Currently implemented only for etcd v3
  • It is a part of a new Recovery interface
  • It does not require an active kvdb client or connection to kvdb servers
    and is meant to be executed on the server itself

- Added an API ReinitializeDB()
- Currently implemented only for etcd v3
- It is a part of a new Recovery interface
- It does not require an active kvdb client or connection to kvdb servers
  and is meant to be executed on the server itself
@adityadani adityadani requested a review from jvinod April 6, 2019 15:49
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #82 into master will increase coverage by 0.28%.
The diff coverage is 85.18%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #82      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.96%   69.24%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines        3415     3440      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits         2355     2382      +27     
+ Misses        826      824       -2     
  Partials      234      234
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
etcd/v3/kv_etcd.go 67.76% <85.18%> (+0.82%) ⬆️
etcd/v2/kv_etcd.go 68.07% <0%> (-0.33%) ⬇️
consul/kv_consul.go 72.3% <0%> (+0.58%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 135442d...82c52c0. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants