All CGMES models after version 3 can be considered node/breaker #2067
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Luma <zamarrenolm@aia.es>
miovd
reviewed
Apr 11, 2022
| @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ private CgmesNamespace() { | |||
| private static final String CIM_16_SV_PROFILE = "http://entsoe.eu/CIM/StateVariables/4/1"; | |||
| private static final String CIM_16_SSH_PROFILE = "http://entsoe.eu/CIM/SteadyStateHypothesis/1/1"; | |||
|
|
|||
| private static final String CGMES_EQ_3_OR_GREATER_PREFIX = "http://iec.ch/TC57/ns/CIM/CoreEquipment-EU/"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this used? Does it exist? (Just for information)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, to check if an EQ file is version 3 or later (when checking if all loaded EQs are CGMES 3), CgmesModelTripleStore::allEqCgmes3OrGreater
miovd
reviewed
Apr 11, 2022
cgmes/cgmes-model/src/main/java/com/powsybl/cgmes/model/CgmesNamespace.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: VEDELAGO MIORA <miora.ralambotiana@rte-france.com>
miovd
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2022
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
miovd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2022
Signed-off-by: Luma <zamarrenolm@aia.es> Co-authored-by: miovd <miora.ralambotiana@rte-france.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Luma zamarrenolm@aia.es
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'and skip the restCGMES 3 EQ profile enforces use of
ConnectivityNodeseven for bus/branch models, so it is safe to assume we can process any CGMES 3 or later usingConnectivityNodesinstead of relying onTopologicalNodes. If model is bus/branch, internal connections between the equipment and the busbar sections associated to connectivity nodes will be created.What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)