Remove base scenario in DSA #415
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
flo-dup
force-pushed
the
contingency_side_handle
branch
from
8085401 to
a027c0e
Compare
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
flo-dup
force-pushed
the
remove_base_scenario
branch
from
49d9f5e to
fb39c46
Compare
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
|
flo-dup
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix
What is the current behavior?
DSA launch along the provided contingencies scenarios a base case without contingency.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The base case should not be launch.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?