Fix bus imbalance with slack distribution on load #1040
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
caioluke
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
src/test/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/ac/DistributedSlackOnLoadTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix
What is the current behavior?
Observed non-zero bus Q balance when a bus has:
and slack distribution is on loads, with constant power factor.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Correct / zero bus Q balance
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?