Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move runDcLoadFlow from DC sensitivity analysis to DcLoadFlowEngine #1082

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

p-arvy
Copy link
Member

@p-arvy p-arvy commented Aug 26, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

The method runDcLoadFlow is in DC sensitivity analysis

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The method is now an utility method in WoodburyEngine class

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

…ethod

Signed-off-by: p-arvy <pierre.arvy@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Copy link

@annetill annetill changed the title Move runDcLoadFlow from DC sensitivity analysis to Woodbury utility method Move runDcLoadFlow from DC sensitivity analysis to DcLoadFlowEngine Aug 29, 2024
@annetill annetill merged commit b4266bb into main Aug 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@annetill annetill deleted the move-run-dc-lf-from-dc-sensi branch August 29, 2024 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants