[WIP] (OLD : see #1122 and #1123) DC Area Interchange Control Outer Loop #1099
Conversation
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
src/test/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/ac/AreaInterchangeControlTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: vmouradian <valentin.mouradian@artelys.com>
|
| if (parameters.isDistributedSlack()) { | ||
| distributeSlack(network, network.getBuses(), parameters.getBalanceType(), parameters.getNetworkParameters().isUseActiveLimits()); | ||
| double slackBusActivePowerMismatch = getActivePowerMismatch(network.getBuses()); | ||
| double distributedActivePower = 0.0; | ||
| if (parameters.isDistributedSlack() || parameters.isAreaInterchangeControl()) { | ||
| distributedActivePower = distributeSlack(network, network.getBuses(), parameters.getBalanceType(), parameters.getNetworkParameters().isUseActiveLimits()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was like this before, but here we do not account for slack distribution failure behavior parameter.
Could be in another PR, in this case just add a // FIXME.
Important note: in the case of AIC, failing here may not be relevant. Here is done only global slack distribution. But we may have the case of distribution failure when distributing mismatch globally, and at the same time no failure when distributing per area later on in the outerloops.
vmouradian
changed the title
|
@jeandemanged @vmouradian shouldn't this one be closed now that it is split in 2 parts ? |
Yes, I think we can close it now |
HAS BEEN SPLITTED INTO 2 PRs :
#1122
#1123
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
What is the current behavior?
AIC not supported for DC Loadflow
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
AIC outerloop is supported for DC Loadflow
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled
What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)
Other information: