Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes on discrete controls #173

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 27, 2020
Merged

Fixes on discrete controls #173

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 27, 2020

Conversation

annetill
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy anne.tilloy@rte-france.com

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest

No. I have performed some functional tests on IOP dataset. Even if voltage regulation is disabled and phase regulation is disabled, we create discrete voltage and phase control. I have tested OLF on the CGMES files in that context of no discrete regualtion activated. But I have found issues when the regulating terminal does not refer to a bus.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

We now check if it refers the regulating terminal refers to a bus before creating a discrete control. I wonder if it is enough for phase control as the controlled branch can be opened at both side.

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@annetill annetill requested review from geofjamg and flo-dup November 26, 2020 17:53
… created.

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

92.3% 92.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit 816cd9a into master Nov 27, 2020
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the fix-discrete-control branch November 27, 2020 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants