Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LoadFlowResult management after a DC loadflow #190

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 22, 2020
Merged

Conversation

annetill
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy anne.tilloy@rte-france.com

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest

No.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

The LoadFlowResult from powsybl-core is now filled with metrics.

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@annetill annetill requested a review from geofjamg December 21, 2020 12:32
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
@@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ private static AcLoadFlowObserver getObserver(OpenLoadFlowParameters parametersE
prefix + "status", result.getNewtonRaphsonStatus().name());
}

private static ImmutableMap<String, String> createMetrics(DcLoadFlowResult result) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you remove that, it means that we have no metrics at the end of the computation using itools or pypowsybl. The number of iterations is not needed as it means nothing but the status is usefull.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now there is a way to fill status and iteration on component result these metrics are useless ( and this is true also for ac)

Copy link
Member

@geofjamg geofjamg Dec 22, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Metrics might still be useful for output infos not yet normalized in api output

Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

82.1% 82.1% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit 9ef3602 into master Dec 22, 2020
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the dc-loadflow-results branch December 22, 2020 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants