Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug on DC loadflow when using multiple contingencies with transformers #240

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 12, 2021

Conversation

Djazouli
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

…ontingency (they were set to 0)

Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
@Djazouli Djazouli requested a review from annetill March 11, 2021 11:02
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
private final DiscreteVoltageControl voltageControl;

public BranchState(LfBranch b) {
PiModel piModel = b.getPiModel();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you start with just a1 and r1 ? For the controls, it will be more complex (and we don't know how to do).

Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
r1 = piModel.getR1();
}

public void restoreBranchActiveState(LfBranch branch) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you here start with only restoreBranchState ? Sorry for the delay of the remark...

* Set the branch states based on the given map of states
* @param branchStates the map containing the branches states, indexed by branches
*/
public static void restoreBranchActiveStates(Map<LfBranch, BranchState> branchStates) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same remark.

Copy link
Member

@annetill annetill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a small renaming requested but approved!

Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit 0edf606 into master Mar 12, 2021
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the fix_dc_issue_multiple_contingencies branch March 12, 2021 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants