-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
manage additional factors #265
Conversation
3787fa4
to
737f518
Compare
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
737f518
to
335b624
Compare
# Conflicts: # src/test/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/dc/DcSensitivityAnalysisContingenciesTest.java
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, the way it is implemented is very clear and simple.
I am just wondering if there is a better design for ContingencyContext. Marker interfaces are often not considered as a good practice, but not easy find an other simple design.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neat implementation - as already said above! Just a couple of remarks
src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/SensitivityFactorReader.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/AbstractSensitivityAnalysis.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
…bl-open-loadflow into additional_factors Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@artelys.com>
@@ -46,50 +46,54 @@ public SensitivityFactorReaderAdapter(Network network, SensitivityFactorsProvide | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
public void read(Handler handler) { | |||
ContingencyContext commonContingencyContext = new ContingencyContext(ContingencyContextType.ALL, null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just as small improvement, would be better to use 3 static methods to create ContingencyContexts (ContingencyContext.createAllContingencyContext()
, ContingencyContext.createNoneContingencyContext()
, ContingencyContext.createSpecificContingencyContext(String id)
)
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel <gael.macherel@gmail.com>
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Signed-off-by: Gael Macherel gael.macherel@artelys.com
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'
to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'
and skip the restWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)