Sensitivity analysis: support of dangling line contingency #300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
flo-dup
approved these changes
May 5, 2021
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
annetill
commented
May 6, 2021
| assertEquals(0.3695, getContingencyValue(result, "dl1", "g1", "l1"), LoadFlowAssert.DELTA_POWER); | ||
| assertEquals(36.794, getContingencyFunctionReference(result, "l1", "dl1"), LoadFlowAssert.DELTA_POWER); | ||
|
|
||
| network.getDanglingLine("dl1").getTerminal().disconnect(); // FIXME: if I comment this line, I don't retrieve the base sensitivity value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Hadrien-Godard can you look at my FIXME please? I am not able to retrieve the sensitivity value on the base case simply.
annetill
commented
May 6, 2021
| assertEquals(-0.3700, getContingencyValue(result, "dl1", "load3", "l1"), LoadFlowAssert.DELTA_POWER); | ||
| assertEquals(3.0071, getContingencyFunctionReference(result, "l1", "dl1"), LoadFlowAssert.DELTA_POWER); | ||
|
|
||
| network.getDanglingLine("dl1").getTerminal().disconnect(); // FIXME: if I comment this line, I don't retrieve the base sensitivity value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Hadrien-Godard Same here.
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Hadrien-Godard
approved these changes
May 6, 2021
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'and skip the restNo but we know that the feature is missing.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Now, you can simulate the loss of a dangling line in AC and DC sensitivity analysis. TODO: branch tripping does not support dangling lines.
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
It is not supported.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
We loose a line and a fictitious bus.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)