Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dangling line boundary bus sensitivity #309

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 25, 2021
Merged

Conversation

geofjamg
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

geofjamg added 2 commits May 21, 2021 16:34
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
@geofjamg geofjamg changed the title Dangling line boundary bus sensitivity [WIP] Dangling line boundary bus sensitivity May 21, 2021
geofjamg added 5 commits May 25, 2021 10:15
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
@geofjamg geofjamg changed the title [WIP] Dangling line boundary bus sensitivity Dangling line boundary bus sensitivity May 25, 2021
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
@geofjamg geofjamg requested a review from annetill May 25, 2021 10:49
Copy link
Member

@annetill annetill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some minutes to add a test. This PR can be added in the next release!

List<LfSensitivityFactor> skippedFactors = lfFactors.stream().filter(factor -> factor.getStatus() == LfSensitivityFactor.Status.SKIP).collect(Collectors.toList());

skippedFactors.forEach(factor -> valueWriter.write(factor.getContext(), null, -1, 0, Double.NaN));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@annetill TODO documentation should be increased with that feature.

@@ -714,4 +716,30 @@ void testOldApiAdapter() {
assertEquals(0d, values.get(2).getFunctionReference(), LoadFlowAssert.DELTA_POWER);
assertNotNull(values.get(2).getContingencyId());
}

@Test
void testDanglingLineSensi() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am going to add a test for a DanglingLine injection for an AC sensitivity analysis.

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

96.3% 96.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit 2f28f79 into master May 25, 2021
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the sensi_dangling_line branch May 25, 2021 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants