Security analysis: disconnect terminals of isolated end nodes #325
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
|
What happens if while propagating a contingency, we encountered an openable switch which is just before a 3WT? The question being, is the 3WT still working when one of its leg is disconnected? |
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
annetill
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2021
flo-dup
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
In security analysis, if an end node is encountered after an openable switch, the corresponding terminal is not disconnected.
Note that originally this PR was opened not to retained switches if they are encountered just before encountering a line / a 2wt while propagating the contingency. But a line / 2wt opened on one side is not equivalent to a disconnected line / 2wt.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
In security analysis, if an end node is encountered after an openable switch, the corresponding terminal is disconnected.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
No